Concurrent Technologies Corporation Named One of Top Five “Best for Vets Employers” by Military Times EDGE Magazine

Concurrent Technologies Corporation (CTC) has once again been recognized as a “Best for Vets Employer” by Military Times EDGE Magazine. There were over 1,000 nominees, and only 53 companies across the nation were chosen for this honor. CTC made the top five companies–placing fourth based on its hiring, recruiting, and retention practices. The complete Best for Vets Employers 2013 list is available on the Military Times Web site. CTC also made the list in 2010 and 2011.

“CTC has policies and procedures in place to recruit active duty and veteran military members and ensure their success as CTC employees,” said Edward J. Sheehan, Jr., CTC President & Chief Executive Officer.

“Our policies go above and beyond what is required by law and what many other companies have in place. In addition, Peggy Cavanaugh, CTC Payroll Specialist, goes out of her way to ensure that transitions between CTC life and active duty are as smooth as possible. Our employees attend send-off gatherings and return parties for deployed personnel, and send care packages and signed banners to employees stationed overseas. We are extremely grateful for the service of our military employees.”

CTC also offers the use of its videoconferencing services to families of employees that are stationed overseas. The program has been offered for over five years and will continue in order to allow military members and their families to see and talk to each other throughout deployments.

CTC’s commitment to hiring veterans and active duty military personnel extends beyond policies and procedures. CTC is a member of the U.S.

Army Partnership for Youth Success (PaYS) Program, partnering with the Army to help veterans obtain civilian jobs after they conclude their service. CTC is also a member of the 100,000 Jobs Mission, a coalition of 99 (as of April 23, 2013) companies committed to hiring 100,000 transitioning service members and military veterans by 2020. Started in March 2011, 64,628 veterans have already been hired as of March 31, 2013.

CTC has earned numerous recognitions from the Employer Support of the Guard and Reserve (ESGR) over the years, including the Patriot Award, the Pro-Patria Award, and the Extraordinary Employer Support Award. In addition, CTC has been named a “Most Valuable Employer for Military” by CivilianJobs.com and received the “Flag of Freedom” Award for hiring Missouri veterans under Missouri Governor Jay Nixon’s “Show-Me Heroes” initiative.

“Currently 18% of CTC’s workforce is veteran employees, and 23% of new hires in 2012 were veterans as well,” concluded Mr. Sheehan. “Hiring veterans and active duty military members allows CTC to gain new employees that are already specially-trained technical experts, and they are in a unique position to help us provide the best possible solutions to our clients.”

Concurrent Technologies Corporation (CTC) is an independent, nonprofit, applied scientific research and development professional services organization providing innovative management and technology-based solutions to government and industry. As a nonprofit 501(c)(3) organization, CTC’s primary purpose and programs are to undertake applied scientific research and development activities that serve the public interest. For more information, visit www.ctc.com.

SDLC Partners Expands Geographic Region to Target Philadelphia and New Jersey’s Healthcare Industries with New Hire, Mike Yetter

SDLC Partners L.P. is pleased to announce that Mike Yetter joined the organization on April 8, 2013 as the Healthcare Industry Lead. Mike will be responsible for business development and client relationship management with healthcare clients in Greater Philadelphia and New Jersey.

SDLC’s three principal partners—Chris Simchick, Scott Barnyak, and Christy Maruca—are excited about his decision to join the team and support the firm’s overall growth strategy. “Mike brings a very strong track record of delivering results for himself and his team and comes to SDLC Partners focused on growing our presence in the Philadelphia and New Jersey regions,” said Scott Barnyak, Principal Partner. “He is a valuable addition to our team. His background and knowledge will contribute to our expertise and footprint in the marketplace.”

Michael is an experienced healthcare professional with more than 10 years of experience in the areas of consumer healthcare digital strategy, healthcare mobility, digital connected health and wellness, and healthcare sales force enablement tools.  Michael spent 6 years with Independence Blue Cross and has prior experience with Accenture and as an independent healthcare and ecommerce consultant.  He has worked across the healthcare industry including health payers and pharmaceutical manufacturers. Mike’s industry knowledge and strategic goals will help pave the way for continued success in the evolution of the firm.

About SDLC Partners

SDLC Partners, L.P., headquartered in Monroeville, PA, opened its doors in 2004 as the business minded, tech savvy, people-driven alternative to large consulting organizations.   The firm’s 375+ employees deliver process improvement, analytics, and technology solutions to Fortune 1000 and mid-market customers by effectively working with business and I.T. to serve as the “execution partner of choice” for improving speed to market, reducing costs, and enhancing quality.

For more information about SDLC Partners, visit www.sdlcpartners.com or contact Scott Barnyak at 412-373-1950 or sbarnyak@sdlcpartners.com.

Human Resources HandBook: Job Descriptions

By Peter J. Ennis, Esq., Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney, PC

peter.ennis@bipc.com

Job descriptions can be among the most important employment documents for three reasons.  First, how do you decide what skills, experience or other qualifications you are

Peter Ennis

Peter Ennis

looking for in a new employee?  How do you decide which applicants are minimally qualified, sufficiently qualified to merit an interview, or best qualified to be hired?  What are the key duties you want the employee to address, once she is hired?  If you have the answers to the foregoing questions, you have the makings of a job description, even if there is nothing in writing.  If you do not know the answers to the foregoing questions, at least generally, then I would submit that you are not in a position to hire or promote the best candidate or make a lawful decision.  One of the key benefits of a written job description is that it forces the employer to think about the foregoing questions in advance and decide what is most important, fairly important or of little or no importance.  While some employers think job descriptions restrict their discretion (which I will address in more detail below), I believe they help employers to focus on factors that will lead to hiring a successful employee.

Second, besides helping employers hire and promote the most qualified employees, a good job description helps establish expectations and avoid surprises.  As I have said a number of times in these postings, one reason why employees sue their employers is that they are surprised by action taken against them.  Where action is taken based on an employee failing to comply with one or more duties or expectations in a written job description, it will be very difficult for the employee to claim that she was surprised.  For example, if the job description says that job requires the ability to work non-traditional hours, an employee hired into that position will not be able to argue that he can only work Monday through Friday, 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.

Third, unlike many other employment-related documents, a good job description will play an essential role in three types of legal disputes:

  1. In deciding whether an employee is exempt from overtime pay under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) and the courts will look at written job descriptions to determine whether the duties listed meet one of the tests to be exempt.  While a good job description will not end the analysis, a job description which is not written in a manner to support an exemption will make it much more likely that employee will be found to be non-exempt.
  2. In determining what job duties are essential and what types of accommodations are reasonable under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), the EEOC (and its state counterparts) and the courts will look to a written job description.  As with an investigation under the FLSA, the job description will not be the only thing considered, but a good job description (i.e., one meeting the standards set forth below), may be decisive in supporting the employer’s position.
  3. In any hiring or promotion case where an applicant or employee was rejected because she either failed to meet the minimum qualifications or was not the best qualified, a good job description will provide objective support for the employer’s position which can be determinative of the outcome.

Before reviewing what goes into a good job description, I want to point out one misnomer.  Many, if not most, “job descriptions” go beyond actually describing the job and include “job qualifications.”  I am going to take this approach, although it is certainly permissible to have a separate document describing the job qualifications.

Information to Consider Including in a Job Description

One common reason I hear for not having a written job description is that the employer does not want to be restricted by a job description and/or they do not want their organization to be structured so formally.  In my opinion, neither reason is sufficient to avoid having a written job description.  Rather, they just go to how the job description is written.  The only exceptions are for very basic positions (e.g., a laborer), in which a list of job qualifications may be sufficient, or sometimes in a union environment where the union actively uses job descriptions to restrict what employees do.

Your organization may not need or include all of the following items in your job descriptions.  The list is designed simply to be a guide.

  1. Title.  From an employee’s perspective, a title may be important because of the status derived from the title.  From the employer’s perspective, it can be important to show lines of progression.  For employers who want a relatively flat organization and/or want to avoid formal lines of progression, the title can reinforce that goal by broadly describing a wide range of employees.  For example, everyone may be described as either “manager” or “associate.”  Conversely, unique titles can help define the employee’s role for both the employee and the rest of the organization.  I read a series of postings recently asking what to call someone who was responsible for making sure employees had “fun.”  Suggestions ranged from the basic, “Manager of Fun” (and I am not sure there how many employers who pay for such a person) to things like “Manager of Employee Satisfaction and Engagement.”
  2. Reporting Relationship.  Stating to whom the employee reports raises many of the same issues as discussed under title.  This element is also important for those employers who want to make sure that employees are getting proper direction and support.  For example, employers do not want to be in a position where the employees says “I was told to do  ’x’ by Manager A,” when the employee should be getting direction from Manager B.
  3. Supervises.  Again, saying what positions an employee supervises raises the same issues as title and reporting relationship.  However, it has the additional role of ensuring that the employee knows her responsibility and, for an employee who is treated as an exempt executive under the FLSA, it is important for the description to identify that the employee supervises at least two full-time equivalent positions.
  4. Exempt Status.  Where a job description sets forth sufficient information to qualify the employee as exempt from over-time pay under the FLSA, it is not essential to superficially say that the employee is exempt.  Nonetheless, I believe it helps establish expectations and avoids surprise, and it may play a minor role in a DOL investigation.
  5. Summary.  For ease of reference and to identify key job functions, some job descriptions will provide a short summary of the job duties and/or purpose of the job.  If it helps either the employer or employee set or understand expectations, then I would include it.
  6. Duties.  Depending on the job, the duties should be written broadly so that they capture key functions, and do not just specific duties.  For example, it might refer to “managing x,y,z” or “coordinating a,b,c.”  In addition, the functions/duties should be divided between “essential” and “other.”  While those terms do not have to be used, “essential job functions” is a phrase used under the ADA, so it is worth at least considering using that word or phrase.  The other benefit about using a word like “essential” is that it helps both the employer and employee focus on what is important.  “Other” job duties should be listed because, even though they may not be essential and, thus, could not be a barrier to employment under the ADA, if they are duties that the employer may want the employee to perform, then they should be listed.  Finally, all job descriptions should include a statement saying something like: “Other job duties as assigned by management.”  This gives the employer flexibility to assign different job duties as needed.
  7. Physical Demands.  If there are any specific or unusual physical demands of the job, those should be listed.  Not only will they set the expectations for the employee, but they will help the employer defend against a claim under the ADA.
  8. Work Environment.  Again, if there is anything specific or unusual about the work environment, they should be listed because, like physical demands, they help to set expectations and provide a defense where an employee cannot meet them.  Work environment would include such things as work hours (including weekend work), whether the job involves working outside or in hot or cold environments, noise levels, travel requirements, particular stressors in the job, etc.
  9. Americans With Disabilities Act.  Some job descriptions either have a separate section, or include as part of the physical demands or work environment, a statement that the employer will make reasonable accommodations under the ADA.
  10. Job Qualifications.  As set forth above, these are not job duties, but they are often included in job descriptions.  One reason to do that is, once you have established the essential job functions, the job qualifications should be tied to those functions.  To give an obvious example, if an employee is not going to supervise anyone, then managerial experience is not an appropriate job qualification.  On the other hand, if an employee is going to manage the accounting department, then having management experience and a degree in accounting may be critical.  Job qualifications are generally broken down into three categories: education/certifications/licenses; experience; and job knowledge, skills and abilities.  Furthermore, where appropriate, they can be further divided into “minimum” and “preferred.”  Minimum allows you to reject anyone who fails to meet those requirements, while preferred helps to define the best candidate.  Both categories can provide a defense in an employment lawsuit, as long as they meet the standards set forth below.

Are There Downsides to a Job Description?

Yes.  A job description which is inaccurate can lead to bad decisions by the employer (e.g., an employee who three months into the job says, “this is not how the job was described,” or “I do not think I am suited for this job”), unlawful decisions (e.g., rejecting a minority applicant for not meeting the minimum job requirements when those requirements are not tied to the ability to perform the job), or put an employer in a position where the job description is being used against it, rather than supporting it (e.g., a job description which shows that an employee who is treated as exempt from overtime is not, in fact, exempt).

The other downside to an inaccurate or poorly written job description is that it can lead to disputes in which the employee is able to say, “that is not part of my job description.”

Best Practices in Drafting Job Descriptions

To help ensure that a job description is accurate and up-to-date, first ask the incumbent employee and manager of the employee what the job entails.  As part of that discussion, get an understanding of what is essential and non-essential.

Second, make sure what the incumbent and manager tell you is consistent with what you expect from the job.  The incumbent may be doing something because “that is the way it has always been done.”  If there are duties that you do not want or need the employee to perform, or duties you want to add, make sure those are communicated to the employee and manager.

Third, write the job duties broadly to ensure the employer has flexibility, and also include the catchall saying other duties “as assigned.”  In addition, ensure that you use terminology that is consistent with any exemption you are going to claim under the FLSA.  For example, if you are going to claim that someone is an exempt administrative employee, make sure you say that the employee exercises independent judgment and discretion over matters of significance, at set forth duties that support that language.

Fourth, make sure the job “qualifications” are tied to the essential job functions.  Because of the legal impact of those qualifications, and the job description in general, it would be worthwhile having them reviewed by a human resource professional and/or an employment lawyer.

Fifth, have the employee sign and date the job description saying that she understands those are her duties.

Finally, review any job description when you have reason to believe the duties may have changed (e.g., there is a different reporting structure) or where an employee has been in a job for a long-time (e.g., three or more years), so that the job duties may have evolved over time.

The Next Idea: Formal Friday’s at Net Health Systems

Formal Friday was a hit a Net Health. They want other tech companies to join in the fun!

Formal Friday was a hit a Net Health. They want other tech companies to join in the fun! Photographs by Rebecca Clever cargocollective.com/RACphotography and Net Health Employees

As a way to keep the creative fires burning, Net Health Systems has taken a twist on the now ubiquitous Casual Friday.

During this year’s Net Health Connect event, CEO Anthony Sanzo was inspired after donning a tux with CIO Christopher Hayes and President Patrick Colletti for a company breakfast meeting at the Harp & Fiddle.

The formal attire was for comic relief, but in seeing the employees react — heckle, really –  he thought it might be a cool idea to promote the inverse of Casual Fridays by instituting quarterly Formal Fridays at the offices.

The first Formal Friday saw many of Net Health’s employees shining their shoes, straightening their ties and pressing their dresses to look their snazziest best.The entire team was treated to Black Tie Bowling to celebrate their good looks and teamwork.

“It was a blast,” said Colletti. “I can see this growing virally where Pittsburgh companies celebrate and gather…like a well-dressed flash mob.”

Sanzo is envisioning an IT High Tea or some tech-related meet up where local tech companies can show off their Formal Friday Best.

Looking to don your best on Fridays? Join the movement by contacting Dana Bethune at dbethune@nhsinc.com. Stay tuned for a full story detailing Net Health’s culture on Techburgher and TEQ magazine in the coming weeks!

Human Resources HandBook: The Basics on Offer Letters

Peter Ennis

Peter Ennis

By Peter Ennis, Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney

peter.ennis@bipc.com

How can a simple offer letter be one of the top ten employment documents employers should consider?  To answer this question, I will refer to one of the points I made in my original post, which is that there are generally four underlying reasons that employees sue their employer: (1) they are surprised by the decision; (2) they feel the employer has treated them unfairly; (3) they feel they have no choice because they have no income; and (4), they are malcontents and would sue under any circumstances.  What is important about these factors is that employers substantially control the first two.  Therefore, employers can reduce legal risks by preventing surprise and treating employees fairly.  That is where a good offer letter is critical.  If it sets forth the employer’s expectations and some the key aspects of the job, it will make it more difficult for the applicant/employee to subsequently claim surprise or unfairness.  For an employer that does not utilize many other employment documents, the offer letter becomes even more important.

Information Which Employers Should Consider Including in Offer Letters

Among the issues employers can or should address in an offer letter are the following:

Job title/Responsibilities.  Particularly for employers that do not have job descriptions, stating the job title in the letter at least sets forth some expectation of the parties’ agreement regarding the employee’s duties.  Including a basic description of job duties or responsibilities will make the expectations even clearer.

Job Location/Work Hours.  If the employee is (a) expected to travel for substantial amounts of time, (b) planning to work some or all of his time from home, or (c) expected to work non-traditional hours (i.e., nights or weekends), those are all expectations that should be addressed in the offer letter.

Start Date.  If either the employer or applicant wants an immediate start date or wants to put it off, that needs to be included in the offer letter.  Otherwise, the parties’ expectations will be frustrated from the beginning of the relationship.

Compensation.  This not only could involve describing an hourly pay rate, monthly salary, etc., but can also include the basic elements of any bonus or commission system that was discussed.  Because bonuses and commission often lead to disagreements with employees, the more accurately it is described in writing, the better.

Benefits.  Is the applicant going to receive (a) the standard benefit package for someone at her level, (b) no benefits, or (c) special additional benefits not offered to all employees (e.g., extra vacation, a car allowance, laptop computer. Etc.)?  If so, the basics of the parties’ deal should be described in the letter.

Classification.  If the applicant is going to be treated as exempt from overtime, that should be stated in the offer letter to avoid the applicant from expecting to receive overtime when he ends up regularly working over forty hours per week.

Employment at will.  Most offer letters contain a statement confirming that employment is at will, pursuant to which the employer or employee can terminate the relationship at any time for any reason.

Restrictions on the Applicant from Prior Employment.  If an applicant is subject to a non-compete or non-solicitation agreement from a prior employer, or is otherwise restricted in what she may be able to do (e.g., using a former employer’s trade secrets), an offer letter can protect the new employer by having the applicant affirm in writing that she has returned all material belonging to the former employer, prohibit the applicant from violating her prior agreements and restrictions, and tell the applicant who she is to inform in the event of a potential future violation.

Restrictions on the Applicant by the Employer.  If the new employer wants the applicant to sign a restrictive covenant, the applicant has to agree to such restrictions before or at the time of becoming employed.  If it is done after the employee begins employment, then the employer is probably going to be required to pay the employee additional consideration for signing the agreement to make the restrictions enforceable (at least in Pennsylvania).  Therefore, the offer letter can enclose the agreement, tell the applicant that she is going to have to sign it on her first day of work, or the terms of the restrictive covenant can actually be included in the offer letter.

For the foregoing reasons, offer letters can have a substantial impact on reducing an employer’s potential legal liability.  At the same time, they can substantially help the employment relationship and the employee’s productivity by setting forth in advance the employer’s basic expectations for the employee.

Are There Downsides to Offer Letters?

The only real downside to an offer letter is where it does not say what the employer intended, or if it makes a commitment that the employer cannot subsequently meet.  For example, an offer letter might say that the applicant is “entitled” to an “annual” bonus or commission calculated in a particular manner.  If the employer subsequently runs into financial difficulties, it might be difficult to avoid paying the employee what he was “promised” in the offer letter.  That type of problem could arise in any of the categories set forth above.  What if the employee was told she could work at home “x” days per week, but then a new boss comes in and requires everyone to work in the office (as was done by Yahoo)?  What if the employee is told that he will be employed for three years, but the employer becomes dissatisfied with the employee’s work prior to the expiration of the three year period?

Avoiding the foregoing problems is a matter of careful drafting by the employer. Unless the employer has made a particular promise to an applicant, an offer letter can be written to give the employer discretion to make changes to the relationship if circumstances change.

Best Practices in Drafting Offer Letters

Offer letters are one document where it would benefit the employer to create a “fill-in-the-blank” form.  The form does not have to be the same for every employee, as long as each candidate for a particular position receives the same basic form.  This will enable employers to consider, in advance, how much they want to put into offer letters and to draft them using language that meets the employer’s needs.

If a “form” document is used, then it should be reviewed by a human resource professional or employment lawyer to avoid the pitfalls described in the preceding section.

Finally, it is a good practice to have the applicant sign and date the letter under a line stating that the he has read the letter and is accepting the offer on the terms stated.  This helps reduce future disagreements over what the applicant was told when she was hired.